PublicIssue.ORG

 New issue

 Comment on this issue

 Vote on this issue

"Where your opinion counts!"

email@PublicIssue.org

Saddam's ouster, was it necessary?

The press never ceases to amaze me!  The US and British press seem to be bent on criticizing of our leaders, example, headlines today in Britain; "Blair visits Iraq as questions back home, grow regarding the need for Saddam's ouster."  This is bull.  I spend a lot of time talking with people about everything and I've only heard 2 people ever say anything similar.  So does that mean the growing concern is now 4 people instead of 2?  I think the press is simply looking for a story and doesn't realizes just because a handful of people make a statement it doesn't mean the world is upset.  Can't they simply make an candid report, whey do they always have to sensationalize everything.  Isn't their a media that simply gives the facts?

TJ/Michigan

05/29/2003

Back to PublicIssue.org   Business Directory   NewComputers.NET    IT help live!   ComputerUpgradeZ.com