PublicIssue.ORG |
||
"Where your opinion counts!" |
email@PublicIssue.org |
Saddam's ouster, was it necessary?
The press never ceases to amaze me! The US and British press seem to be bent on criticizing of our leaders, example, headlines today in Britain; "Blair visits Iraq as questions back home, grow regarding the need for Saddam's ouster." This is bull. I spend a lot of time talking with people about everything and I've only heard 2 people ever say anything similar. So does that mean the growing concern is now 4 people instead of 2? I think the press is simply looking for a story and doesn't realizes just because a handful of people make a statement it doesn't mean the world is upset. Can't they simply make an candid report, whey do they always have to sensationalize everything. Isn't their a media that simply gives the facts?
TJ/Michigan
05/29/2003
Back to PublicIssue.org Business Directory NewComputers.NET IT help live! ComputerUpgradeZ.com